Friday, 15 September 2023

Golden Village Cinemas as a Value Play?- Revisiting Investment Thesis

Contributed by: The Big Fat Whale

In an earlier article, we have covered Orange Sky Golden Harvest which is listed in Hong Kong. They are the owners of the popular Golden Village cinemas. They also have a presence in Hong Kong and Taiwan. Their latest foray is into China with a 360 theatre in Suzhou that is meant for live performance- it is able to house up to 2700 spectators.

Source: AAStocks

The stock has seen exciting movements after our article, on a quick upsurge to 18 cents in March 2023 from the 6.5 cents level. It has actually reached our target (18 cents) which was highlighted in our report. It was mainly speculative flow as it has since retreated back. The catalyst was mainly due to the newsflow that TVB is getting their stars to do live-stream sales on the Taobao online platform.

This is our recently published book where we touched on how we go about valuing stocks and our insights into the investment world. Authored by a Chartered Financial Analyst, it encompasses 2 decades of experience in the market that is condensed into this book. Hope you can lend support to our website and gain insights into the world of investment by purchasing the Kindle Ebook (Sample Copy) or the Paperback.


Loss More than Doubled

Source: Orange Sky Golden Harvest Announcement

Recently, the company has seen a further drop in prices to a low of 4.6 cents, which could be due to their latest financial results announcement. The headline number is the loss has more than doubled on a half-yearly basis.

However, the loss has more than doubled because there was a non-recurring gain in the first half of 2022 of HK$56.5 million. If we exclude the one-off gain from the disposal of office property, there was actually a 64% reduction in loss. So things are turning better from the numbers itself.


Click Here for the Full Article:

https://thebigfatwhale.com/golden-village-investment/


Thursday, 7 September 2023

Is it Time to buy Sea Ltd after a 90% Plunge?

Contributed by: The Big Fat Whale


There has been lots of talk about Sea among investors, especially so, with the almost 90% plunge from its peak at around $350. At its peak with a valuation north of 200 billion US dollars in late 2021, SEA dwarfs the valuation of all 3 Singapore banks combined. 

It has been a tough journey for SEA, as their valuations have taken a hit of close to 90%. With such an attention-grabbing drop, it led to us examine if SEA's current valuation is worth a look at.  SEA was highlighted in our recently published book, where it came to our attention when it was just trading at $10, but it has been a rollercoaster ride since then.

There have been many reports on SEA where they went in-depth on their business model, so we will just highlight their 3 main business which is namely: Ecommerce-Shopee, Digital Entertainment- Gaming(Garena) and Digital Financial Services- Maribank, SeaMoney etc. We will be focusing more on their outlook given what we have read so far and based on our analysis of their financial ratios.

 

Sea Financials

Stock/Price P/EP/BPrice/CashFlowPrice/SalesDebt to EquityInterest CoverageCurrent RatioReturn on Investment
Sea/37.5863.5291.6674%111.82.46%

Looking at the financial ratios of SEA, it does not seem to be a real bargain from a value investing point of view. P/E of 86 and even the price to cash flow of 28 don't look like a bargain at this juncture. However, they could just be turning around as Shopee was bleeding in the initial stages but has since managed to churn out a profit on an EBITDA basis. Do note that they were on a huge cost-cutting exercise recently which could have led to the profits in the ecommerce division.

This gives us hope that the trend will persist and with the network effect of their platform, better profitability days are ahead. Sea has been profitable on a net income basis over the last 3 quarters.


Click Here for the Full Article:

https://thebigfatwhale.com/time-to-buy-sea-after-share-plunge-of-90/

Friday, 14 July 2023

Fiverr – Investing in the King of Platform for Freelancers

Contributed by: The Big Fat Whale



It has been a treasure-hunting time for battered growth stocks. After our
previous article on Teladoc, this time round we would like to touch on Fiverr. We are trying to shortlist companies that have a proof of concept, a runway for sustainable growth and a sound business model.

Fiverr is a platform that connects freelancers with business owners looking for services in various digital projects, including website design, content writing, and voice-overs. In recent times, even artificial intelligence and data analytics is added to their portfolio of services. Their main competitor would be Upwork and Freelancer.com.

 

Growth of the Freelance Market

According to a report by Growth Market Reports, the online market was valued at USD 5.1 billion in 2022 and is expected to reach USD 18.3 billion, expanding at a CAGR of 15.1% by the end of 2031.

The market growth is attributed to the rising adoption of freelance platforms by established companies around the world increasing the talent pool for businesses and providing secured jobs and payments to freelancers.

Source: Fiverr Investor Deck

There is a huge addressable market for freelance services of 247 billion US dollars just in the US and we have not touched the other parts of the world yet which Fiverr have a foothold on. To put things in perspective, Fiverr's revenue for 2022 is just 337 million US dollars.

 

What is Going Well?

With the world moving more into an open work concept where freelancers and remote working could be part of the human resource set-up. Adding on, the migration of traditional freelancing activity to the online world is just in its infancy with a good growth runway.  The prospect of Fiverr's business model as a platform marketplace for freelancers and employers looks sustainable and viable.

Source: Fiverr Investor Deck

Also, Fiverr has one of the most recognisable brands in the freelance marketplace. Their bigger competitors are Upwork and Freelancer.com. Their growth metrics such as active buyers and spend per buyer have also been on a good upward trajectory. The average spend is 262 dollars which is lower than their main competitors as Fiverr clients are usually acquiring a one-off service rather than on a long-term project basis.


Click Here for the Full Article:

https://thebigfatwhale.com/fiverr-investing-in-the-king-of-platform-for-freelancers/

Saturday, 1 July 2023

Is Teladoc a Buy Now?- Revisiting Investment Thesis

Contributed by: The Big Fat Whale



With the growth stocks being in a slum, it is a time for value-oriented investors to go through the rampage and see if there are any potential multi-baggers to be found.  We love to search in out-of-favour sectors and themes, as the margin of safety would be more prevalent.

Previously, we published our research on Teladoc which is almost 1.5 years ago, our closing thoughts were that it was in a sunrise industry with a bright outlook, but despite them falling 60% from $300 to $125, we have our reservations and preferred to stay on the sidelines. We advise you to go through our previous article so as to have a better comprehension of the issues we will be touching on in this article.

Source: Investing.com

It has since fallen by another 80%, from $125 to its current level of $25. The dramatic fall has attracted our attention and we decided to revisit it to see if there could be a change to our initial thesis of staying on the sidelines.

Click Here for the Full Article:

https://thebigfatwhale.com/is-teladoc-a-buy/

Saturday, 6 May 2023

Negative Equity Stocks- Is it An Outright Sell?

Contributed by: The Big Fat Whale

Recently, I have been looking up Oracle's financials to see if it is something that I would add to my watchlist. In a usual filtering process, using value investing metrics such as Price to Book, Debt to Equity and Return on Equity, Oracle would never appear in the list.

The reason being it is having negative equity. In simple terms, when you take their total assets and net off their total liabilities, they are coming in with a shortfall.

So it brings us to the question:

Are Negative Equity Stocks an Outright Sell?

Negative equity stocks, also known as “underwater stocks,” are shares of companies that are trading below their book value or the total value of their assets. In other words, if a company has more liabilities than assets, it can result in negative equity. While negative equity might seem like a cause for concern for investors, there are situations where it may not necessarily be a bad thing.

 

Why Negative Equity Might Be a Cause for Concern?

Negative equity can often be a red flag that something is not right with a company. It could indicate that the company has taken on too much debt or made poor investments, leading to financial troubles. In such situations, the company may struggle to pay off its debts and interest, which can lead to bankruptcy.

Negative equity may also be a sign of declining or stagnant revenues. If a company is losing money and not generating enough cash to cover its operating costs, it could result in a negative equity situation. This may be due to increased competition, changing market conditions, or poor management decisions.

 

Why Negative Equity Might Not Be a Bad Thing?

While negative equity might be a cause for concern in many cases, there are situations where it may not necessarily be a bad thing. For instance, a company with negative equity may have a large number of intangible assets, such as patents or brand value, that are not reflected in its book value. Such companies may be worth more than their current market value, even if their book value is negative.

Say, for example, McDonald's is one of the world's most recognisable and valuable brands, the brand value is estimated at 42 billion dollars. On their books, it is only valued at less than 2 billion dollars.

The value will only emerge when the business is sold with the total brand worth (the additional 40 billion dollars) highlighted as goodwill in the acquiring company accounts.

Market Values vs Book Values (In Millions) - Credit: OShaugnessy Asset Management

Also, when companies are acquiring other companies, the intangible assets/goodwill would be subjected to writing off on a gradual basis. So using back the McDonald's example, the 42 billion dollar brand value would see a write-off every year, despite the Mcdonald's brand value might be getting more valuable through advertising strategy and etc. The effect on the financial statements would be lower profitability and hence lower book value.

The company could also be buying back their shares in an aggressive mode or paying back huge dividends that would have an impact of turning the company into a negative equity situation. Even Apple, thou it is not in negative equity, Apple has negative retained profits as the company have been aggressively buying back its shares for the past few years.

Another reason why negative equity might not be a bad thing is when a company is undergoing a turnaround or restructuring. If a company is making strategic changes to its operations, such as selling off unprofitable divisions or reducing debt, it may be able to improve its financial position over time. In such cases, investors may see an opportunity to buy the stock at a lower price before it turns around.

 

Are Negative Equity Stocks an Outright Sell?

From a Singapore market perspective, I believe it is usually the case as negative equity stocks are not very common. It is negative equity for the right and logical reason, which translates to the company being in distress.

However, the US markets have lots of good quality companies that have been in negative equity situations at some point in time. Some examples will be Home Depot, McDonald, Yum Brands and Oracle.

Instead of writing a negative equity stock off, if the company have strong branding or is an established name, we should look beyond the trees. There could be other metrics such as revenue growth, profit growth, interest coverage and positive operating cash flow that we could look into. If there is a contradiction to the base thesis for the negative equity scenario which is a red flag by itself, we should revisit the investment decision.

As for Oracle, I am still in the midst of my research. The huge negative equity figure could be due to their huge acquisitions through the years and goodwill have to be written off that could have led to a negative equity situation. After saying that, their acquired companies could be worth more than what they are acquired at which the negative equity is more an accounting exercise than what Oracle is actually worth.

Given that their software solution and Java program create a sustainable moat for the company, I will not be too bothered by the negative equity situation. Nonetheless, at a PE of 30, there could be a better entry level.

To sum up, being in negative equity does not mean it will be an outright sell but more due diligence would be needed if the company is an attractive investment based on its growth and earnings prospect.

 

We hope you liked this write-up and do subscribe to our website to receive insightful articles whenever they are published.

 

Disclaimer:

The content here is for informational purposes only and should NOT be taken as legal, business, tax, or investment advice. It does NOT constitute an offer or solicitation to purchase any investment or a recommendation to buy or sell a security. The content is not directed to any investor or potential investor and may not be used to evaluate or make any investment. Do note that this is not financial advice. If you are in doubt as to the action you should take, please consult your stockbroker or financial advisor.